Design and Validation of a Digital Well-Being Model in Iran

Authors

    Ensiyeh Nira PhD Student, Department of Communication Sciences, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Seyed Ali Rahmanzadeh * Associate Professor, Department of Social Communication Sciences, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. salirahmanzadeh@yahoo.com
    Soraya Ahmadi Assistant Professor, Department of Social Communication Sciences, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
https://doi.org/10.61838/dmbaj.212

Keywords:

Digital well-being, Conceptual model, grounded theory, one-sample t-test, Iran, digital literacy, Quality of Life

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to design and validate a conceptual model of digital well-being tailored to the Iranian socio-cultural and technological context. Methodology: The study employed an exploratory mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine experts in communication, health, and psychology, and analyzed using Strauss and Corbin’s grounded theory methodology. In the quantitative phase, the proposed model’s validity and comprehensiveness were assessed using a one-sample t-test based on responses from 30 subject matter experts. Findings: Results revealed a five-dimensional framework encompassing causal conditions, contextual factors, intervening conditions, strategies, and outcomes. All eight validity indicators and four comprehensiveness indicators were statistically significant (p<0.01), with all mean scores exceeding the threshold of 3. The highest expert consensus was observed for the impact of intervening factors and model responsiveness to societal challenges. Conclusion: The final digital well-being model is theoretically robust, empirically validated, and culturally relevant to the Iranian context. It offers a practical framework for policymakers, educators, and digital platform designers to enhance digital literacy, mental health, and civic engagement in digital environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aali, M., & Ramezanian, H. (2021). Digital well-being and its requirements: A critique of the dominant discourse on the well-being of children in cyberspace. National Conference on Philosophy,

Al-Mansoori Reem, S., Al-Thani, D., & Ali, R. (2023). Designing for Digital Wellbeing: From Theory to Practice a Scoping Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, 9924029-9924029. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9924029

Al-Mansoori, R. S., Naiseh, M., Al-Thani, D., & Ali, R. (2021). Digital Wellbeing for All: Expanding Inclusivity to Embrace Diversity in Socio-Emotional Status. Proceedings of the BCS 34th British HCI Conference 2021,

Anderson, J. L., & R, L. (2018). The Future of Well-Being in a TechSaturated World. https://www.jscm.ir/article_209021.html?lang=en

Büchi, M. (2020). A Proto-Theory of Digital Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11182

Büchi, M. (2021). Digital Well-Being Theory And Research. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/k3e2j

Burr, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). The Ethics of Digital Well‑Being: A Thematic Review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2313-2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8

Flick, U. (2020). An introduction to qualitative research. Nashr-e Ney. https://uk.sagepub.com

Galvan, E. G., & Newman, C. L. (2025). The Digital Detox Paradox: Potential Backfire Effects of Digital Detox Interventions on Consumer Digital Well-Being. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156251322105

Gluckman, P., & Allen, K. (2018). Understanding wellbeing in the context of rapid digital and associated transformations: Implications for research, policy and measurement (The International Network for Government Science Advice, Issue. https://www.ingsa.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/10/INGSA-Digital-Wellbeing-Sept18.pdf

Hynes, M. (2021). The Smartphone: A Weapon of Mass Distraction. In The Social, Cultural and Environmental Costs of Hyper-Connectivity: Sleeping Through the Revolution (pp. 71-84). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-976-220211005

Lyngs, U. (2019). Putting Self-Control at the Centre of Digital Wellbeing. https://ulriklyngs.com

Mandal, S., & Hawamdeh, M. M. K. (2025). Digital Well-Being and AI: Navigating the Intersection Between Technology and Mental Health. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9015-3.ch004

Sassani, M., & Akbari, E. (2020). Analysis of cultural and media consumption of media generations in social media: A study of virtual space users in Tehran. Journal of Sociological Studies, 27(2), 325-359. https://www.jcsc.ir/article_246266.html?lang=en

Svensson, D. (2019). Digital wellbeing, according to Google. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8976353

Vanden, A. M. M. P., & Nguyen, M. H. (2022). Digital well-being in an age of mobile connectivity: An introduction to the Special Issue. Mobile Media Communication, 10(2), 174-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221080899

Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S., & Van Den Brande, L. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens (In Jrc-Ipts, Issue.

Yue, A., Pang, N., San, L., Torres, F., Luis, M., & Samseer, M. (2021). Developing an Indicator Framework for Digital Wellbeing: Perspectives from Digital Citizenship (No.1). (DQ institute, National University of Singapour, Issue. https://ctic.nus.edu.sg/resources/CTIC-WP-01(2021).pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-08-05

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Nira, E., Rahmanzadeh, S. A., & Ahmadi, S. (2025). Design and Validation of a Digital Well-Being Model in Iran. Dynamic Management and Business Analysis, 4(2), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.61838/dmbaj.212

Similar Articles

1-10 of 282

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.